The study conducted by London School of Economics (LSE) examined whether those who watch shows that ‘glamourise fame, luxury and the accumulation of wealth’ were more likely to be in favour of welfare cuts.
After interviewing 487 British adults aged between 18-49 about their viewing habits of shows including The Apprentice, X-Factor, Keeping Up With the Kardashians and Made in Chelsea as well as their consumption of luxury magazines, they found that those who indulged regularly tended to hold ‘stronger materialistic and anti-welfare attitudes than lighter consumers of these shows’.
Yikes. Dr Levya, who spearheaded the study, said, ‘The Apprentice, Keeping Up With The Kardashians and X-Factor are replete with [mixed media messages] that are engineered to absorb audiences into the glamorous world of wealth and celebrities and thus have a strong potential to function as cultivators of materialistic values and attitudes.’
‘Humans are inherently materialistic but also very social and communal,’ Dr Levya continued, ‘The way this is expressed depends on our culture. If there is more emphasis on materialism as a way to be happy, this makes us more inclined to be selfish and anti-social, and therefore unsympathetic to people less fortunate.’
Another aspect of the study split their interview subjects into two groups: one which was exposed to lots of glamorous images of products, celebrities and newspaper headlines versus another that watched ‘neutral stimuli’ (basically stuff about nature, dinosaurs and the London underground).
After being shown 12 images for five seconds each, they were then immediately asked about wealth, success, impoverished people as well as government welfare reforms which have been shown to genuinely have negative effects on the people and institutions they claim to be supporting.
The study stated, ‘Results showed a significant treatment effect of momentary exposure to materialistic media on both anti-welfare attitudes and support for anti-welfare policies. This suggests that just 1 intermittent minute of attention to common and typical materialistic media messages caused a significant increase in anti-welfare sentiments'.
Dr Levya wrote, ‘This study can contribute to explanations for why the UK public’s support for welfare to aid the impoverished and unemployed has been decreasing during a time of rapidly growing wealth disparities, living costs, and rates of precarious and underemployment.’
This article originally appeared on Marie Claire UK
